Difference Between Utilitarianism And Nietzsche - 934 Words

Paper One Philosophy Utilitarianism and Nietzsche Utilitarianism is the actions that things are right by what makes others the happiest. Utilitarianism and Nietzsche theories are very important to know because they show us ways that our society conducts in. Knowing these theories can help us understand or even question the way we believe. The theory is Utilitarianism is an ethical theory of right and wrong and it solely relies on outcomes. Some criticisms of act-utilitarianism are slavery and the act that it was permissible if produced that person the greatest amount of happiness. Rule-utilitarianism is a rule that creates the greatest good, which means even if it’s a bad act upon society if it was to reach the greatest good, it is†¦show more content†¦When we do something noble, we do it for the emotional satisfaction that we receive. That’s why serial killers get satisfaction from killing, because that’s what brings them emotional satisfaction. So, emotionally it doesn’t have to be a good act t o feel that sense of happiness. Act-utilitarianism follows utilitarianism meaning that they would do the right action according to the situation. They try to judge the right of actions based on what they choose. There is no in between in these theories, all of them want to maximize happiness. Knowing how to tote up utility is generated by various actions. Whatever makes an action right or wrong the consequences behind them is what an act-utilitarianism would go by. Critics argue that act-utilitarianism is not consistent with our considered judgements about justice. According to hedonism the only thing that is good in this world is self-pleasure and happiness. Others see desires whatever that person desires, is what is good in the world. A lot of people believe that Act-utilitarianism is objective but it’s very the rule of worship is where act-utilitarianism criticize rule-utilitarianism for irrationally supporting rule-based actions. They recognize rules can have values but they have no time to deliberate. R ule-worship believes that act-utilitarianism and rule-utilitarianism is different. Happiness is intended pleasure, and absence of pain; by â€Å"unhappiness†. When people know that more good can be done, the rule is overridden.Show MoreRelatedThe Theories Of Pleasure And Ethics1544 Words   |  7 Pagesinteresting gentlemen such, Friedrich Nietzsche and John Stuart Mills were important influential philosophers from the early 19th century. I’ll be comparing both philosophers’ theories of pleasure and ethics. Also, I’m going to focusing on the major similarities and differences they individually perceive on both topics. Now let us walk through both of their individual backgrounds to get familiar with their ideas and beliefs on society. German Philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche was recognized from his writingsRead MoreThe Idle No More Movement1478 Words   |  6 Pages Friedrich Nietzsche is a German philosopher that has a great influence on Western philosophy. One of his works called On the Genealogy of Morals discusses an overlying theme of superiority and power as well as â€Å"good and bad†. This book discusses the difference that the power that superior people have compared the the weak and poor. Nietzsche exemplifies how the powerful seem to â€Å"forget† about issues that do not pertain to themselves where as the weak fight for the issues (Nietzsche, 2007, pp 14)Read MoreNietzsche And Mill s Theory Of Morality Essay1505 Words   |  7 Pages Nietzsche and Mill have explored the theory of ‘morality’ from different perspectives. The two philosophers appear to get along that the notion ‘morality’ has been exploited to a great extent, though a little certainty has been provided on the issue. The two philosophers agree on the complexity of the issue. Mill’s theory of ethics is based on the concept of ‘utility. The philosopher provides the meaning of the idea as it has been largely perverted. Nietzsche stipulates that ‘morality’ is notRead MorePhilosophy of Ethics Essay2233 Words   |  9 Pagespleasures: the need of life, bodily health, and peace of mind. One of the last major philosophers of Virtue Ethics was Plutarch who advocated virtue but disagreed with Epicurus because he believed there was no true pleasure. At this same time, between 400 B.C.- 40 B.C. Stoic philosophers such Cicero, who combined the philosophies of Aristotle and Plato, developed his idea on ethic s and how everyone has a duty and should imitate virtue for others. He said duty has two points which are to achieveRead More Comparing Nietzsche and Schopenhauers Attitudes Towards Life3293 Words   |  14 PagesComparing Nietzsche and Schopenhauers Attitudes Towards Life ABSTRACT: On the basis of his metaphysics, Schopenhauer was led to advocate quietism and resignation as attitudes toward life. In the course of his career, Nietzsche reversed his estimation of Schopenhauer from initial agreement to final excoriation. In what follows, I examine and assess the grounds on which Nietzsche revised his opinion of Schopenhauer as educator of humanity. I argue that three fundamental issues divide Nietzsche andRead MoreAn Overview Of The Ethical1407 Words   |  6 Pagesï ¿ ¼Ã¯ ¿ ¼ÃƒËœÃ¯Æ'Ëœ Various philosophers through the centuries have had a tremendous impact on the way modern society thinks. ØïÆ'Ëœ Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900) influenced modern thinking with his â€Å"God is dead† philosophy. This meant that there was no longer any room for God in an enlightened and civilized society. ØïÆ'Ëœ John Stuart Mill (1806-1873) helped popularize the philosophy of utilitarianism. The basic idea is that morality is determined based upon what is the greatest good for the greatest number of people. ØïÆ'ËœRead MoreContemporary Ethical Theory Philosophers5014 Words   |  21 Pagesmuch happiness some action produces. Moore and Ross denied that the rightness of an act or the goodness of an end can be defined in terms of happiness or any other natural property or thing. (They disagreed with each other about the relationship between rightness and goodness.) But like the utilitarians, they believed that moral judgments are a type of factual judgment.thics and virtue ethics, as explained in Chapter 10The contemporary British linguistic philosopher R. M. Hare (1919–2002) saidRead MoreThe Universal Declaration Of Human Rights3323 Words   |  14 Pagesimportant to note that criticisms towards human rights have existed since eighteenth century. A lot of criticisms have come from utilitarian philosophers such as Jeremy Bentham (Benthan 1943) and John Stuart Mill. The reason behind this is that utilitarianism believes that goodness or truth are not abstract principles and can change their meaning depending on the context in which they are discussed. While Benthan rejected the idea of rights viewing them as neither observable nor enforceable, Mill wentRead MoreKant s Categorical Imperative For The Practice Of Modern Medicine3842 Words   |  16 Pagesmaxim always a legislating member in the universal kingdom of ends.† In order to act in accordance with these formulations one must use his/her reason and avoid acting out of rash passions and desires. Kant saw human nature as experiencing a tension between animal inclinations and the voice of rationality which we should aim to listen to. Thus autonomy is all important in order for us to govern our decision making process and think through Kant’s formulations to give the most moral outcome. Kant wasRead MoreThe Emergence And Development Of Russia s Radical During The Post Reform Era2688 Words   |  11 PagesFrank Masi History 127B How would you explain the emergence and development of Russia’s radical intelligentsia during the post-reform era? What were the major ideological positions and differences? Why were these positions believed to be the only possible paths to significant political change? The emergence of the intelligentsia can be heavily attributed to a general feeling of unease towards the future of the Russian Empire, which is examined by David Saunders in his book entitled â€Å"Russia in the